Quantcast The Middlebury Campus
College Media Network

Professors debate "amorous relationships"

Cloe Shasha

Issue date: 1/10/08 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
Media Credit: Grace Duggan

Faculty members gathered on Jan. 7 to discuss a proposal regarding "amorous relationships" between faculty and students. Led by President of The College Ronald D. Liebowitz and Faculty Associate in Admissions Miguel Fernandez, the meeting covered a range of moral, ethical and professional issues surrounding these relationships.

Liebowitz mentioned that American colleges and universities have different policies surrounding the issue of faculty-student relationships. After extensive research and discussions, Middlebury has proposed to follow the American University Policy guidelines which stipulates that faculty entering supervisory, advisory, evaluative or pedagogical roles with students must report an amorous relationship to the dean of faculty so the College can evaluate the situation case by case.

"We are avoiding a punishment for the relationship," said Fernandez. "We are instead punishing faculty in these positions who are not reporting their relationships with students."

A debate about the word choice of "amorous" rather than "sexual" was spurred during the meeting. Some faculty expressed their preference of a full ban on relationships between faculty and students.

"We considered a full ban, but encountered challenges," Liebowitz explained. "How would we enforce a policy against these relations? Who would investigate, and with what judicial mechanism? If there were a ban, faculty could be threatened to lose employment. We also do not want to infantilize our students. Our primary goal is to minimize the negative effects of these relationships on the education of our students."

Faculty members are discouraged to engage in amorous relationships with students, although this is vaguely stated in the proposal from the American University Policy guidelines.

Stafford Professor of Public Policy, Political Science and Environmental Studies Chris Klyza suggested that the proposal include the line: "Such relationships are viewed as inappropriate."

Fernandez explained the fundamental concerns of the College regarding the type of relationship that a faculty member engages with a student.

"If a faculty member gets into a relationship with a student once in a career, it may not be a concern to the College," said Fernandez. "If, however, it happens every semester, it might be an issue. Our policy is trying to address that issue. These relationships should be avoided for the community's sake and for the individual's sake. If a relationship between a faculty member and student is jeopardizing a student's educational interest, the relationship could be reported to the student's parents."
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 2 of 2

rmhundley

Rev. Robert M. Hundley

posted 1/10/08 @ 11:19 PM EST

Sexual relationship between folks is usually great, not unlike playing a terrific game of tennis. Read the "Song of Songs." The body was created good. (Continued…)

Mike Heaney 64

posted 1/21/08 @ 1:47 PM EST

Gosh. I think it all depends on what "amorous" is. (Before the college in its hoary wisdom brought it up, I actually thought it meant "loving," an d wondered, "What could be wrong with that?" Silly me. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Advertisement